Two players, one answer.
Cade Otton vs Justin Fields
Any league · Dynasty Superflex, 12 teams
Stats through week 8 of 2026 (in progress)
This week
No call this week: one of them has no game or a projection under 4 pointsRest of season
Cade Otton by 8% (Redraft half PPR)Dynasty
Justin Fields by 62% (Dynasty Superflex)
| 1,004 | Value | 2,644 |
| 296th | Rank · Dynasty SF | 90th |
| 7.8 | Points a game | 14.8 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| Same | In a year | +5% |
Straight up · Dynasty Superflex
Fields by 62%
Getting Justin Fields for Cade Otton: highway robbery.
A 62% edge, as the calculator measures it: he's worth 163% more
+62%
Every format
Value on the 0–9,999 board
| Format | Cade Otton | Justin Fields | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex | 1,004 | 2,644 | Fields +62% |
| Dynasty 1QB | 1,071 | 1,481 | Fields +28% |
| Dynasty Superflex, TE premium | 1,171 | 2,751 | Fields +57% |
| Dynasty Superflex IDP | 1,016 | 2,592 | Fields +61% |
| Redraft PPR | 709 | 716 | Even |
| Redraft half PPR | 838 | 771 | Otton +8% |
| Keeper PPR | 658 | 1,021 | Fields +35% |
| Best ball half PPR | 1,527 | 1,946 | Fields +22% |
Values on the 0–9,999 scale of the boards, from the same model as every Swindlr trade check; the edge is the straight-up trade check, which counts value above what a team could pick up for free. "In a year" is the age curve alone. Stats through week 8 of 2026 (in progress).