Two players, one answer.
Cade Otton vs Justin Fields
Any league · Dynasty Superflex, 12 teams
Stats through week 8 of 2026 (in progress)
This week
No call this week: one of them has no game or a projection under 4 pointsRest of season
About even (Redraft PPR)Dynasty
Justin Fields by 63% (Dynasty Superflex)
| 969 | Value | 2,644 |
| 301st | Rank · Dynasty SF | 90th |
| 7.8 | Points a game | 14.8 |
| 27 | Age | 27 |
| −4% | In a year | +4% |
Straight up · Dynasty Superflex
Fields by 63%
Getting Justin Fields for Cade Otton: highway robbery.
A 63% edge, as the calculator measures it: he's worth 173% more
+63%
Every format
Value on the 0–9,999 board
| Format | Cade Otton | Justin Fields | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex | 969 | 2,644 | Fields +63% |
| Dynasty 1QB | 1,008 | 1,407 | Fields +28% |
| Dynasty Superflex, TE premium | 1,066 | 2,649 | Fields +60% |
| Dynasty Superflex IDP | 992 | 2,618 | Fields +62% |
| Redraft PPR | 669 | 682 | Even |
| Redraft half PPR | 777 | 709 | Otton +9% |
| Keeper PPR | 626 | 978 | Fields +36% |
| Best ball half PPR | 1,501 | 1,909 | Fields +21% |
Values on the 0–9,999 scale of the boards, from the same model as every Swindlr trade check; the edge is the straight-up trade check, which counts value above what a team could pick up for free. "In a year" is the age curve alone. Stats through week 8 of 2026 (in progress).