Two players, one answer.
Evan Engram vs Tim Jones
This week
No call this week: one of them has no game or a projection under 4 pointsRest of season
Evan Engram by 70% (Redraft standard)Dynasty
Tim Jones by 34% (Dynasty Superflex)
| 258 | Value | 392 |
| 581st | Rank · Dynasty SF | 520th |
| 6.9 | Points a game | 4.1 |
| 32 | Age | 28 |
| −34% | In a year | Same |
Straight up · Dynasty Superflex
Jones by 34%
Getting Tim Jones for Evan Engram: highway robbery.
A 34% edge, as the calculator measures it: he's worth 52% more
+34%
Every format
Value on the 0–9,999 board
| Format | Evan Engram | Tim Jones | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex | 258 | 392 | Jones +34% |
| Dynasty 1QB | 288 | 318 | Jones +9% |
| Dynasty Superflex, TE premium | 267 | 401 | Jones +33% |
| Dynasty Superflex IDP | 238 | 370 | Jones +36% |
| Redraft PPR | 438 | 75 | Engram +83% |
| Redraft half PPR | 551 | 116 | Engram +79% |
| Keeper PPR | 391 | 165 | Engram +58% |
| Best ball half PPR | 1,117 | 258 | Engram +77% |
Values on the 0–9,999 scale of the boards, from the same model as every Swindlr trade check; the edge is the straight-up trade check, which counts value above what a team could pick up for free. "In a year" is the age curve alone. Stats through week 8 of 2026.