Two players, one answer.
Calvin Ridley vs Tre' Harris
Any league · Week 8 start/sit · Standard
Stats through week 8 of 2026 (in progress)
This week
Toss-up · 4.5 to 4.1 projected (Week 8, Standard)
Rest of season
Tre' Harris by 34% (Redraft standard)Dynasty
Tre' Harris by 67% (Dynasty Superflex)
Week 8 · Standard · 52% held up in 2025
A toss-up
On Sleeper's projections, Calvin Ridley is projected 0.4 points ahead of Tre' Harris. In the 2025 season, a player projected that far ahead outscored the other 52% of the time. That's close to a coin flip: on these projections neither is the better start, and an injury report or a projection update before kickoff can tip it.
WR · TEN
Calvin Ridley
— final · points pending · 4.5 projected
@ CIN · Sun 1:00 PM ET
1.6 a game this season · last 3: 1.3, 3.3, 0
WR · LAC
Tre' Harris
4.1 projected
@ LAR · Sun 4:05 PM ET
4.5 a game this season · last 3: 7.6, 6, 1.6
- Their games have already kicked off, so most platforms have locked them in or out for this week.
What the call rests on
- Calvin Ridley: Sleeper's projection, last changed Sun, Nov 1, 7:30 PM ET
- Tre' Harris: Sleeper's projection, last changed Sun, Nov 1, 7:30 PM ET
- Sleeper's projections read Sun, Nov 1, 7:36 PM ET.
- Injury statuses read Sun, Nov 1, 7:36 PM ET, with the projections (hourly). A fresh projection time doesn't mean every status is: game-day inactives, about 90 minutes before kickoff, can come after it.
| Same projections, scored | Ridley | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| PPR | 7.1 | 6.6 |
| Half PPR | 5.8 | 5.3 |
| Standard | 4.5 | 4.1 |
What could change it before kickoff
- A projection update of 0.4 points or more in the other direction flips the call; Sleeper keeps adjusting its projections until kickoff, and this page reads them again at most an hour after it last did.
- Calvin Ridley plays first (Sun 1:00 PM ET); once his game starts most platforms lock him in or out, before Tre' Harris's late news is known.
Open in Who should I start (your league, more players)
This week’s projections are Sleeper’s, scored with Standard settings. The percentage is how often a projected gap like this held up across the 2025 season; checked against 2026 games (not used to fit it), the stated chances so far run a few points high, so read a 60% call as nearer 55%.