Two players, one answer.
Deion Burks vs Noah Fant
This week
No call this week: one of them has no game or a projection under 4 pointsRest of season
Noah Fant by 47% (redraft PPR)Dynasty
Deion Burks by 36% (Dynasty Superflex)
| 968 | Value | 618 |
| 301st | Rank · Dynasty SF | 434th |
| 3.1 | Points a game | 6.5 |
| 23 | Age | 28 |
| — | In a year | Same |
Straight up · Dynasty Superflex
Burks by 36%
Getting Deion Burks for Noah Fant: highway robbery.
A 36% edge, as the calculator measures it: he's worth 57% more
+36%
Every format
Value on the 0–9,999 board
| Format | Deion Burks | Noah Fant | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex | 968 | 618 | Burks +36% |
| Dynasty 1QB | 814 | 667 | Burks +18% |
| Dynasty Superflex, TE premium | 935 | 635 | Burks +32% |
| Dynasty Superflex IDP | 926 | 595 | Burks +36% |
| Redraft PPR | 209 | 392 | Fant +47% |
| Redraft half PPR | 327 | 567 | Fant +42% |
| Keeper PPR | 396 | 395 | Even |
| Best ball half PPR | 395 | 1,274 | Fant +69% |
Values on the 0–9,999 scale of the boards, from the same model as every Swindlr trade check; the edge is the straight-up trade check, which counts value above what a team could pick up for free. "In a year" is the age curve alone. Stats through week 7 of 2026.