Two players, one answer.
Nate Carter vs Noah Fant
This week
No call this week: one of them has no game or a projection under 4 pointsRest of season
Noah Fant by 49% (redraft PPR)Dynasty
Nate Carter by 30% (Dynasty Superflex)
| 889 | Value | 618 |
| 326th | Rank · Dynasty SF | 434th |
| 3.2 | Points a game | 6.5 |
| 24 | Age | 28 |
| Same | In a year | Same |
Straight up · Dynasty Superflex
Carter by 30%
Getting Nate Carter for Noah Fant: highway robbery.
A 30% edge, as the calculator measures it: he's worth 44% more
+30%
Every format
Value on the 0–9,999 board
| Format | Nate Carter | Noah Fant | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynasty Superflex | 889 | 618 | Carter +30% |
| Dynasty 1QB | 950 | 667 | Carter +30% |
| Dynasty Superflex, TE premium | 883 | 635 | Carter +28% |
| Dynasty Superflex IDP | 867 | 595 | Carter +31% |
| Redraft PPR | 202 | 392 | Fant +49% |
| Redraft half PPR | 324 | 567 | Fant +43% |
| Keeper PPR | 395 | 395 | Even |
| Best ball half PPR | 369 | 1,274 | Fant +71% |
Values on the 0–9,999 scale of the boards, from the same model as every Swindlr trade check; the edge is the straight-up trade check, which counts value above what a team could pick up for free. "In a year" is the age curve alone. Stats through week 7 of 2026.